HomeCompare · Duckie
Serviceplane vs Duckie
Duckie is an autonomous AI agent that resolves support tickets. Serviceplane is a service desk for every channel — phone, text, chat, email and web forms — where the assistant answers only from approved knowledge, hands off to a person the moment it should, and every action lands on a verifiable audit trail.
In their words
What Duckie says it is
Duckie - AI Support Agents
“AI support agents that resolve tickets end to end. Duckie handles your customer support autonomously, learning from your knowledge base to deliver instant, accurate responses 24/7.”
From duckie.ai, 2026-09-22. Their words, not ours; we keep this current and will correct it on request.
Where Duckie is a good fit
Software companies whose support runs on tickets and who want an AI agent to resolve them autonomously, learning from an existing knowledge base and help desk.
What we built differently
Where Serviceplane is different, stated as facts about Serviceplane
Each row is something you can check in a walkthrough. None of it is a claim about how Duckie works inside.
Answers only from approved knowledge, and a gate before go-live
Retrieval is limited to content a person approved; an approved answer card is returned verbatim; no matching source means the assistant abstains and offers a person. Every channel starts in shadow mode and goes live only when reviewed accuracy clears the bar you set (95% by default). How grounding is enforced.
Grounded · Shadow modeA person is one hand-off away, and then the assistant steps back
Hand-off routes to the least-recently-routed available colleague inside published hours, or files the case for the right team after hours with the resident told when staff are back. Once a person has the conversation the assistant stops answering on it — no two voices in one thread.
Hand-offOne case across phone, text, chat, email and web forms
A phone call on the organization's own number, a text, an email to a shared mailbox, a chat and a web form all open or continue one numbered case. Voice is not a bolt-on: the assistant takes the call itself, texts a link mid-call, and a call-back inside a short window continues the same case.
ChannelsAn audit trail the customer can verify, not just read
Every action by the assistant or a person is an append-only event, SHA-256 hash-chained to the one before. A read-only auditor role, filters and CSV/JSON export, a verification call that names the first bad event, and a nightly export to storage you own with a digest ledger. How the record is built.
AuditBuilt for the public sector's constraints
Microsoft 365 shared mailboxes and SharePoint with their permissions, single sign-on and SCIM from your directory (no passwords stored), retention per channel with legal hold, one-file case export for records requests, WCAG 2.1 AA tested in CI, 60 languages detected automatically. For government.
GovernmentSold by the module, run on the models you choose
Channels, cases, copilot, knowledge, connectors and audit are switches — an organization buys what it uses. The model chain per task is yours to set, with fallback across providers; the grounding rules sit above the model, so changing it changes nothing about what the assistant may say.
Modules · ModelsShortlisting
Questions from teams comparing the two
Both answer from a knowledge base. What's different about "grounded" here?
Autonomous or assisted?
Can we bring our history over?
Do you integrate with it?
Is it cheaper?
Can we try it without switching?
Read next
The three things every comparison comes down to
See it answer from your pages — and decline what they don't cover.
We build a workspace from your public site, ask it your hardest questions, and show you the passages behind every answer and the queue behind every miss.